From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Harville

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 15, 2016
144 A.3d 199 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016)

Summary

dismissing the PCRA petitioner's claim that "the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the burglary charge against him because the crime of burglary no longer exists after the 1968 Pennsylvania Constitution"

Summary of this case from Rudolph v. Giroux

Opinion

NO. 439 EDA 2015

03-15-2016

Com. v. J. Harville


Affirmed.


Summaries of

Com. v. Harville

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 15, 2016
144 A.3d 199 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016)

dismissing the PCRA petitioner's claim that "the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the burglary charge against him because the crime of burglary no longer exists after the 1968 Pennsylvania Constitution"

Summary of this case from Rudolph v. Giroux
Case details for

Com. v. Harville

Case Details

Full title:Com. v. J. Harville

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Mar 15, 2016

Citations

144 A.3d 199 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2016)

Citing Cases

Rudolph v. Giroux

After de novo review, this Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that these claims are procedurally…