From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Vito

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 18, 2012
46 A.3d 1284 (Pa. 2012)

Opinion

2012-06-18

Anne WILSON in her own Right and Anne Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of her Deceased Husband, James Wilson, Appellant v. Sandi VITO, Secretary Department of Labor and Industry and Honorable Joseph Hagan and Honeywell, Inc. (Formerly Allied Signal, Inc.) and Travelers Casualty And Surety Company And Owens Illinois, Inc., and Eric Kadish, Appellees.


No. 51 EAP 2011, Appeal from the Order Entered on 6/14/2011, in Commonwealth Court at No. 935 M.D.2010.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of June, 2012, the order of the Commonwealth Court is

AFFIRMED. The motion filed by Appellees, Honeywell, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, for leave of court to file a reply brief pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2113 is DENIED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Vito

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 18, 2012
46 A.3d 1284 (Pa. 2012)
Case details for

Wilson v. Vito

Case Details

Full title:Anne WILSON in her own Right and Anne Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Jun 18, 2012

Citations

46 A.3d 1284 (Pa. 2012)