Commonwealth v. Dorman

1 Citing case

  1. Commonwealth v. Fosco

    182 Pa. Super. 326 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1956)

    In sustaining convictions of attempted burglary it has been held that not only the intent to break and enter the building but also the intent to commit a felony after entering can be inferred from such circumstances as being on a second story porch in a strange community at night with a pocket device which could be used for opening doors. Com. v. Dorman, 86 Pa. Super. 205 (1925). See also Com. v. Myers, 131 Pa. Super. 258, 200 A. 143 (1938); Com. v. Stefanczyk, 77 Pa. Super. 27 (1921); and State v. Woodruff, 208 Iowa 236, 225 N.W. 254 (1929).