From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Dolph

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 31, 2023
292 A.3d 1130 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023)

Summary

holding that Bradley does not create right to file subsequent PCRA petition outside PCRA's one-year time limit as method of raising ineffectiveness of PCRA counsel or permit recognition of such right

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Callahan

Opinion

No. 551 EDA 2022 No. 552 EDA 2022.

01-31-2023

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. William Robert DOLPH, Appellant. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Robert Dolph, Appellant.


Non-Precedential Decision

See Pa. Superior Court Internal operating Procedures, § 65.37 before citing

Granted. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Dolph

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.
Jan 31, 2023
292 A.3d 1130 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023)

holding that Bradley does not create right to file subsequent PCRA petition outside PCRA's one-year time limit as method of raising ineffectiveness of PCRA counsel or permit recognition of such right

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Callahan

holding that Bradley does not create right to file subsequent PCRA petition outside PCRA's one-year time limit as method of raising ineffectiveness of PCRA counsel or permit recognition of such right

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Walker

noting that a petitioner "who wishes to assert claims that PCRA counsel was ineffective can request to have new counsel appointed to permit the assertion of such claims or can seek to represent himself"

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Fries
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Dolph

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. William Robert DOLPH, Appellant…

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Jan 31, 2023

Citations

292 A.3d 1130 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Windon

Commonwealth v. Stahl, 292 A.3d 1130, 1136 (Pa. Super. 2023). To the contrary, the Supreme Court made…

Commonwealth v. Wright

We find no merit to Appellant's argument that his petition is timely under Bradley, as our caselaw makes…