From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Derhammer

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 26, 2015
116 A.3d 601 (Pa. 2015)

Opinion

No. 373 MAL 2014

2015-05-26

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Petitioner v. Joseph Walter DERHAMMER, Respondent.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as framed by Petitioner, is as follows:

Did the Superior Court err in affirming the trial judge's decision precluding the Commonwealth from referencing [Respondent's] pre-arrest failure to inquire as to the welfare of the victims, specifically the [Respondent's] spontaneous, self-initiated contact with police, that was not in response to any police questioning, after he arrived at the arson scene of his own volition?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Derhammer

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
May 26, 2015
116 A.3d 601 (Pa. 2015)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Derhammer

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner v. JOSEPH WALTER DERHAMMER…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: May 26, 2015

Citations

116 A.3d 601 (Pa. 2015)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Derhammer

Our Supreme Court granted the Commonwealth's allowance of appeal in that case on an interlocutory issue. See…