From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Brown

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Dec 14, 2016
164 A.3d 461 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 357 EAL 2016

12-14-2016

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Darnell BROWN, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:

(1) Because an autopsy report constitutes testimonial hearsay, does not use of that report by another expert as the basis of his own opinion violate the Sixth Amendment guarantee of the right of Confrontation?
(2) Because Rule 703 allows an expert to use inadmissible evidence to form an opinion but does not allow that inadmissible evidence to be used for its truth, did not the Superior Court err in concluding that Rule 703 permitted the testimony in this case where the testifying expert's opinion has relevance and probative value only if the report he relied on is true?


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Brown

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Dec 14, 2016
164 A.3d 461 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. DARNELL BROWN, Petitioner

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

164 A.3d 461 (Pa. 2016)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Brown

Op. at 331-32; seeCommonwealth v. Brown , 139 A.3d 208, 218–19 (Pa. Super. 2016). As this was the second…

Commonwealth v. Brown

Op. at 25; see Commonwealth v. Brown, 139 A.3d 208, 218-19 (Pa. Super. 2016). As this was the second issue…