From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth of Pa. v. Neiman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 10, 2011
27 A.3d 984 (Pa. 2011)

Opinion

2011-08-10

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondentv.James Howard NEIMAN, Jr., Petitioner.


Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 937 MAL 2010.

Prior report: 5 A.3d 353.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

1. Whether Pennsylvania [Act 152 of 2004] violates the single[-]subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

2. Whether, if Act 152 violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, Megan's Law can be sustained by severance of the remaining portions of Act 152 of 2004.


Summaries of

Commonwealth of Pa. v. Neiman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Aug 10, 2011
27 A.3d 984 (Pa. 2011)
Case details for

Commonwealth of Pa. v. Neiman

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondentv.James Howard NEIMAN, Jr.…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

27 A.3d 984 (Pa. 2011)

Citing Cases

Sernovitz v. Dershaw

I write separately to note that regardless of this statute, a cause of action for "wrongful life" has never…

Sernovitz v. Dershaw

2. Whether, if Act 152 violates the single-subject rule of Article III, Section 3 of the Pennsylvania…