From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth ex rel. Stuckey v. Burke

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 12, 1950
70 A.2d 456 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1950)

Opinion

January 12, 1950.

Criminal law — Sentence — Imprisonment — County jail — Penitentiary — Equivalent of time served — Indeterminate sentence.

1. Where the punishment for a crime prescribed by statute is by "imprisonment", without more, the legal place of confinement is a county jail.

2. Where a crime is not punishable by imprisonment in a state penitentiary, an indeterminate sentence may not be imposed.

3. Imprisonment undergone in a penitentiary is considered equivalent to a substantially greater period of time served under simple imprisonment in the county jail.

Original jurisdiction. No. 87, Miscellaneous Docket No. 6. Petition for writ of habeas corpus in case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ex rel. Earl O. Stuckey v. C. J. Burke, Warden, Eastern State Penitentiary. Prisoner remanded for resentence.


Relator, Earl O. Stuckey, was indicted, tried, and found guilty of receiving stolen goods (No. 36, February Sessions, 1948, Cumberland County), on May 14, 1948. He was sentenced to undergo imprisonment in the Eastern State Penitentiary for a term of not less than two and one-half years nor more than five years to be computed from May 14, 1948. A fine of $50 was also imposed.

The maximum penalty that could be imposed legally for receiving stolen goods was imprisonment not exceeding five years, or fine not exceeding $1,000, or both. Section 817 of the Act of June 24, 1939, as amended by the Act of May 21, 1943, P. L. 306, § 1, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4817.

The punishment prescribed being by "imprisonment," without more, it follows that the legal place of confinement is the county jail. Com. ex rel. Dennis v. Ashe, 161 Pa. Super. 540, 55 A.2d 433. The imposition of an indeterminate sentence was therefore erroneous and should be corrected also. Com. ex rel. Biancone v. Burke, 164 Pa. Super. 486, 66 A.2d 74.

The District Attorney of Cumberland County admits in his answer to the rule issued on relator's petition that the legal principles as stated are applicable to relator's case.

Relator will be remanded to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Cumberland County for resentence in proper form and according to law. That court should take into consideration, when relator is resentenced, that imprisonment undergone in the penitentiary is considered equivalent to a substantially greater period of time served under simple imprisonment in the county jail. Com. ex rel. Dennis v. Ashe, supra, 161 Pa. Super. 540, 55 A.2d 433.

And now, January 12, 1950, it is ordered and adjudged that the rule previously allowed to show cause why habeas corpus should not issue be made absolute, and the application is treated as though the writ had issued and Earl O. Stuckey were before us; and it is further ordered and adjudged that the prisoner be remanded for resentence, and that the record be remitted to the court below to the end that appropriate process may issue to bring him into that tribunal for resentence in accordance with the law as here announced.


Summaries of

Commonwealth ex rel. Stuckey v. Burke

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 12, 1950
70 A.2d 456 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1950)
Case details for

Commonwealth ex rel. Stuckey v. Burke

Case Details

Full title:Commonwealth ex rel. Stuckey v. Burke, Warden

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 12, 1950

Citations

70 A.2d 456 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1950)
70 A.2d 456

Citing Cases

Com. ex rel. Radziewicz v. Burke

He contends it therefore follows that he should be discharged because imprisonment undergone in the…

State v. Di Paglia

People v. Hightower, 414 Ill. 537, 112 N.E.2d 126, 129, states the omission of place of confinement in a…