From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commissioners v. Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1874
70 N.C. 656 (N.C. 1874)

Opinion

(January Term, 1874.)

Actions against a Board of County Commissioners, must be brought to the Superior Court of the County wherein those Commissioners reside.

CIVIL ACTION, an application for a mandamus, heard 8th September, 1873, before Henry, J., at Chambers in HENDERSON County.

J. H. Merrimon for the appellant.

Carson, and J. C. L. Harris, contra.


The plaintiff, alleging that the Commissioners of Rutherford (657) county owe the Commissioners of Henderson $2,371.66, apply for a mandamus to compel its payment.

Defendants demur for want of jurisdiction. His Honor sustaining the demurrer, dismissed the complaint, whereupon plaintiffs appealed.


The question in this case is the same as in Steele v. Commissioners, ante 137, at this term, and the decision is the same, and for the same reason. The Board of Commissioners of a county must be sued in the county of which they are Commissioners.

There is no error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Commissioners v. Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1874
70 N.C. 656 (N.C. 1874)
Case details for

Commissioners v. Commissioners

Case Details

Full title:BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HENDERSON COUNTY v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1874

Citations

70 N.C. 656 (N.C. 1874)

Citing Cases

Neely v. Craige

PER CURIAM. There is no error. Cited: Morris v. Avery, post, 239; Hinton v. Hinton, post, 414; Blankenship v.…

Morris v. Avery

PER CURIAM. There is error. Cited: Hinton v. Hinton, post, 414; Den v. Love, post, 436; Johnson v. Winslow,…