From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Lapidus

Supreme Court, Special Term, Sullivan County
Dec 20, 1943
182 Misc. 368 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)

Opinion

December 20, 1943.

Benjamin M. Goldstein for defendant.

Harry Schechter and William F. O'Rourke for plaintiffs.


Defendant has made two motions in this action, one for an order directing a further bill of particulars, and the other for an examination before trial of the plaintiffs or their agents and employees.

The demand for a bill of particulars appears to have been fairly complied with, and the motion for a further bill is denied without costs.

The motion for an examination of the plaintiffs before trial would, under the decisions in this department, ordinarily be granted. The State Insurance Fund, however, is an agency of the State ( Sadigur v. State of New York, 173 Misc. 645), and it is not a public corporation within any statutory definition of that term. (General Corporation Law, § 3.) The Legislature has not given its permission for an examination before trial of such a State agency, but has provided only for the examination of a public corporation in a proper case. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 292-a.) That such power has been given, with certain restrictions, to claimants who sue in the Court of Claims (Court of Claims Act, § 17; L. 1939, ch. 860), does not enlarge the power of the court in this action.

Motion for an examination before trial of the plaintiff denied, without costs.


Summaries of

Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Lapidus

Supreme Court, Special Term, Sullivan County
Dec 20, 1943
182 Misc. 368 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)
Case details for

Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Lapidus

Case Details

Full title:COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE INSURANCE FUND; Plaintiffs, v. LEON LAPIDUS…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Sullivan County

Date published: Dec 20, 1943

Citations

182 Misc. 368 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)
50 N.Y.S.2d 589

Citing Cases

De Campos v. State Compensation Ins. Fund

In Rauschan v. State Compensation Insurance Fund, 80 Cal.App. 754 [ 253 P. 173], it was contended that the…

Skakandy v. State of New York

The claim asserted is based on the alleged torts of the Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund in…