From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lincoln

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 1, 1957
242 F.2d 748 (6th Cir. 1957)

Opinion

Nos. 12935-12937.

March 1, 1957.

Charles K. Rice, John Potts Barnes, Lee A. Jackson, John N. Stull, Robert N. Anderson, Stanley P. Wagman, Harry Baum and Elmer J. Kelsey, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Raymond T. Jackson and Charles D. Leist, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


The issue in these cases is whether certain transfers of stock made in connection with the financial rehabilitation of a Florida hotel corporation were sales made indirectly between members of a family within the meaning of section 24(b)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 24(b)(1)(A), so as to preclude deduction of losses from the sales.

The Tax Court concluded that the principles announced in McWilliams v. Commissioner, 331 U.S. 694, 67 S.Ct. 1477, 91 L.Ed. 1750 were inapplicable to the facts of this case, and that "* * * there were no sales, directly or indirectly, by any member of the Lincoln family to David Lincoln." 24 T.C. 669, 699. We agree with the Tax Court's findings and conclusions for the reasons stated in Judge Harron's opinion.

The decisions of the Tax Court are therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lincoln

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 1, 1957
242 F.2d 748 (6th Cir. 1957)
Case details for

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Lincoln

Case Details

Full title:COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Joseph C. LINCOLN and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Mar 1, 1957

Citations

242 F.2d 748 (6th Cir. 1957)