Commercial Union Ins. v. Est. of Plute

2 Citing cases

  1. BOCA MARA PROPERTIES v. INTERN. DAIRY QUEEN

    732 F.2d 1550 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 2 times

    Even though plaintiffs only recovered $33,000 on their substantive claim under the Franchise Act, the amount of recovery is "a factor, it is not of controlling significance" in determining an attorney's fee award. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Estate of Plute, 356 So.2d 54 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.), cert. denied, 356 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1978). Based on the affidavits submitted in this case, an award of $25,000 was within the district court's discretion.

  2. FLA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS. v. CALVERT

    381 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

    PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Sections 627.428 and 627.727, Fla. Stat. (1975); State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Jenkins, 370 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Anderson, 332 So.2d 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Moore v. Sky Realty Inc., 339 So.2d 299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. Estate of Plute, 356 So.2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); and All-Star Ins. Corp. v. Scandia, Inc., 353 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).