From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commercial Bank v. Foltz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

October, 1896.


It having been conceded on the argument of these appeals that the issues of fact settled by the Special Term have been tried before a jury and determined in favor of the plaintiff; that the trial has been completed before the Special Term, and a judgment of foreclosure upon the verdict of the jury and the decision of the Special Term has been entered and the property sold, and that no appeal has been taken from the judgment, the decision of these appeals should stand over until it shall be determined whether an appeal is taken from the final judgment. After that event either party has the right to move this court to decide or dismiss these appeals. All concurred.


Summaries of

Commercial Bank v. Foltz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1896
9 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)
Case details for

Commercial Bank v. Foltz

Case Details

Full title:Commercial Bank, Respondent, v. Moses Foltz and Beaman Catto, Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1896

Citations

9 App. Div. 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)