From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commerce Benefits Group, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 29, 2008
Case No. 1:07CV2036 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07CV2036.

January 29, 2008


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The court held a telephone conference regarding the pending motion to compel (doc. 26) on Jan. 29, 2008. Counsel for defendant McKesson Corp. represented to the court that he would represent (newly added) defendant Per Se Technologies, Inc., once an amended complaint has been filed. See generally doc. 47, at 6-7.

Counsel for plaintiff Commerce Benefits Group, Inc., agreed to a delayed ruling on the pending motion to compel, pending the results of four depositions which have been noticed.

Counsel for defendant assured the court that he will use his best efforts to schedule Rule 30(b)(6) depositions of the two party corporations, to be taken within fourteen (14) days. The court fully expects him to do so, unless good cause is provided to excuse compliance. Further, counsel will then schedule depositions of Robert Riordan and Jay Sloman, to be taken with thirty (30) days.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Commerce Benefits Group, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Jan 29, 2008
Case No. 1:07CV2036 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Commerce Benefits Group, Inc. v. McKesson Corp.

Case Details

Full title:COMMERCE BENEFITS GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. McKESSON CORP., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

Case No. 1:07CV2036 (N.D. Ohio Jan. 29, 2008)