From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Osmond (In re Osmond)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2013
104 A.D.3d 1019 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-14

In the Matter of Jeffrey OSMOND, an Attorney. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Jeffrey Osmond, Respondent.

Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Elizabeth M. Devane of counsel), for petitioner. Jeffrey Osmond, Sayre, Pennsylvania, respondent pro se.


Peter M. Torncello, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany (Elizabeth M. Devane of counsel), for petitioner. Jeffrey Osmond, Sayre, Pennsylvania, respondent pro se.
Before: PETERS, P.J., MERCURE, ROSE and LAHTINEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2003. He maintained an office for the practice of law in Pennsylvania, where he was admitted to practice in 1992.

By order dated October 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania disbarred respondent on consent for several admitted acts of professional misconduct, including converting in excess of $160,000 from a trust for his personal use and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. Additionally, as the result of his actions related to the trust, respondent pleaded guilty to “theft by failure to make required disposition of funds,” a third-degree felony in Pennsylvania.

Petitioner now moves for an order imposing discipline pursuant to this Court's rules ( see22 NYCRR 806.19). Respondent has filed responsive papers indicating that he does not contest the imposition of discipline.

Under all of the circumstances presented, we grant petitioner's motion and further conclude that the same discipline should be imposed by this Court as was imposed in Pennsylvania, i.e., disbarment.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and respondent is hereby forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this Court's rules regulating the conduct of disbarred attorneys ( see22 NYCRR 806.9).

PETERS, P.J., MERCURE, ROSE and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Osmond (In re Osmond)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Mar 14, 2013
104 A.D.3d 1019 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Comm. on Prof'l Standards v. Osmond (In re Osmond)

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Jeffrey OSMOND, an Attorney. Committee on Professional…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 1019 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 1599
960 N.Y.S.2d 340