From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commercial Union Insurance v. Chubb Group of Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 14, 1985
499 A.2d 1362 (N.J. 1985)

Summary

adopting reasoning of Brody dissent

Summary of this case from Medical Protective Co. v. Bell

Opinion

Argued October 21, 1985 —

Decided November 14, 1985.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

James T. O'Halloran argued the cause for appellant ( Tompkins, McGuire Wachenfeld, attorneys; William L'E. Wertheimer, of counsel).

Lawrence D. Smith argued the cause for respondent ( Hein, Smith Berezin, attorneys).


The judgment of the Appellate Division, 194 N.J. Super. 69, is reversed and the judgment of the trial court reinstated substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Brody, reported at 194 N.J. Super. 80.

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For affirmance — None.


Summaries of

Commercial Union Insurance v. Chubb Group of Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 14, 1985
499 A.2d 1362 (N.J. 1985)

adopting reasoning of Brody dissent

Summary of this case from Medical Protective Co. v. Bell
Case details for

Commercial Union Insurance v. Chubb Group of Insurance

Case Details

Full title:COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANIES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CHUBB GROUP…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 14, 1985

Citations

499 A.2d 1362 (N.J. 1985)
499 A.2d 1362

Citing Cases

Vantage Dev. v. American Env. Tech

Exclusionary clauses " subtract from coverage rather than grant it." Weedo v. Stone-E-Brick, Inc., 81 N.J.…

Medical Protective Co. v. Bell

The fund, as an excess carrier, should be liable for the excess coverage due from its insureds (the doctors)…