From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comer v. Stewart

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 29, 2006
471 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 2006)

Summary

granting rehearing en banc to consider whether to grant state habeas petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss the federal habeas proceedings

Summary of this case from Alverson v. Workman

Opinion

No. 98-99003.

Filed December 29, 2006.

Michael D. Kimerer, Esq., Holly R. Gieszl, Esq., Kimerer Derrick, PC, Osborn Maledon, Phoenix, AZ, Denise I. Young, Esq., Tucson, AZ, Julie S. Hall, Esq., Law Offices of Julie S. Hall, Oracle, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

John Pressley Todd, Esq., Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Silverman was recused.


Summaries of

Comer v. Stewart

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 29, 2006
471 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 2006)

granting rehearing en banc to consider whether to grant state habeas petitioner's motion to voluntarily dismiss the federal habeas proceedings

Summary of this case from Alverson v. Workman
Case details for

Comer v. Stewart

Case Details

Full title:Robert Charles COMER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Director…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 29, 2006

Citations

471 F.3d 1359 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Davis

Other circuit courts have held that "a state appellate court's sua sponte consideration of an issue not only…

Comer v. Schriro

That opinion, in which I wholeheartedly concurred, was withdrawn by the en banc court on December 29, 2006.…