From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comeaux v. Mancuso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 5, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01392 (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01392

04-05-2017

LAURIE COMEAUX AND STEVEN COMEAUX v. TONY MANCUSO ET AL.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE WHITEHURST

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 11) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, Objection to the Report and Recommendation filed by defendants Stephanie Boyd, Sharonda Francois, Charles Lavergne, and Tony Mancuso (Rec. Doc. 12), and Response to the Objection filed by the plaintiffs (Rec. Doc. 13), and a de novo determination of the issues, the court determines that the findings of the Report and Recommendation are correct under applicable law.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 5) filed by the plaintiffs is GRANTED.

Alexandria, Louisiana, this 5th day of April, 2017.

/s/_________

DEE D. DRELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Comeaux v. Mancuso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Apr 5, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01392 (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Comeaux v. Mancuso

Case Details

Full title:LAURIE COMEAUX AND STEVEN COMEAUX v. TONY MANCUSO ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Apr 5, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-01392 (W.D. La. Apr. 5, 2017)