From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Comcast Cable Communi v. Finisar Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Apr 10, 2009
319 F. App'x 916 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Summary

ordering the parties to file motions in limine instead of motions to strike

Summary of this case from Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Sys. Inc.

Opinion

No. 2008-1506.

April 10, 2009.

On Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 3:06-CV-04206, Judge William H. Alsup.

David J. Silbert, Keker Van Nest, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were Daralyn J. Durie, and Ajay S. Krishnan.

Larry R. Laycock, Workman Nydegger, of Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for defendant-appellant. Of counsel were Charles L. Roberts, C.J. Veverka, and David R. Todd.

Before BRYSON, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.


Judgment


This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R.36.


Summaries of

Comcast Cable Communi v. Finisar Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Apr 10, 2009
319 F. App'x 916 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

ordering the parties to file motions in limine instead of motions to strike

Summary of this case from Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Sys. Inc.
Case details for

Comcast Cable Communi v. Finisar Corp.

Case Details

Full title:COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FINISAR CORP…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 10, 2009

Citations

319 F. App'x 916 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Raytheon Techs. Corp. v. Gen. Elec. Co.

See Comcast Cable Commc'ns Corp. v. Finisar Corp. , 571 F. Supp. 2d 1137, 1145 (N.D. Cal. 2008), aff'd sub…

Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Sys. Inc.

"To allow premature motions to strike simply encourages both sides to take extreme positions with the…