Comcast Cable Commc'ns v. Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC

Full title: COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Appellant v. REALTIME ADAPTIVE…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 15, 2022

No. 2020-2281 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2020-2281

06-15-2022

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Appellant v. REALTIME ADAPTIVE STREAMING LLC, Appellee KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor.

James L. Day, Jr., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Daniel C. Callaway, Sushila Chanana. Philip Wang, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by C. Jay Chung, Paul Anthony Kroeger, Reza Mirzaie, James S. Tsuei. William LaMarca, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Monica Barnes Lateef, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.

Per Curiam

This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2019-00209, IPR2019-01280.

James L. Day, Jr., Farella Braun & Martel LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by Daniel C. Callaway, Sushila Chanana.

Philip Wang, Russ August & Kabat, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by C. Jay Chung, Paul Anthony Kroeger, Reza Mirzaie, James S. Tsuei.

William LaMarca, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by Thomas W. Krause, Monica Barnes Lateef, Farheena Yasmeen Rasheed.

JUDGMENT

Per Curiam

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Lourie, Prost, and Taranto, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.