From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Wortham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Nov 9, 2000
568 Pa. 662 (Pa. 2000)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

explaining that because a motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to trial, which is similar to a ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, our standard of review of a motion in limine is the same as that of a motion to suppress

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Toomey
See 5 Summaries

Opinion

November 9, 2000.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Judgment and Memorandum Opinion of the Superior Court No. 450 M.D. Alloc. Dkt. 2000.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is Denied.

Summaries of

Com. v. Wortham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District
Nov 9, 2000
568 Pa. 662 (Pa. 2000)

explaining that because a motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to trial, which is similar to a ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, our standard of review of a motion in limine is the same as that of a motion to suppress

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Toomey

explaining that because a motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to trial, which is similar to a ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, our standard of review of a motion in limine is the same as that of a motion to suppress

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Kirkpatrick

explaining decision no longer carries precedential value once it is withdrawn

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Lane

explaining that because a motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to trial, which is similar to a ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, our standard of review of a motion in limine is the same as that of a motion to suppress

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Stokes

explaining that because a motion in limine is a procedure for obtaining a ruling on the admissibility of evidence prior to trial, which is similar to a ruling on a motion to suppress evidence, our standard of review of a motion in limine is the same as that of a motion to suppress

Summary of this case from Com. v. Bozyk
Case details for

Com. v. Wortham

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent v. TERRELL WORTHAM, Petitioner

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District

Date published: Nov 9, 2000

Citations

568 Pa. 662 (Pa. 2000)
795 A.2d 970

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Toomey

When reviewing the denial of a motion in limine, we apply an evidentiary abuse of discretion standard of…

Commonwealth v. Stokes

When reviewing the denial of a motion in limine, we apply an evidentiary abuse of discretion standard of…

10 Citing Cases