From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Commonwealth v. Seel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 29, 1979
406 A.2d 1148 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 1979.

Decided June 29, 1979.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County, Criminal Action at No. 1907/1976, Koch, S.P., Wieand and Davison, JJ.

William G. Sherr, Allentown, for appellant.

William H. Platt, District Attorney, Allentown, submitted a brief on behalf of Commonwealth, appellee.

Before PRICE, SPAETH and LIPEZ, JJ.


The trial judge improperly elicited testimony that appellant had chosen to remain silent at the time of his arrest by questioning the arresting officer as to appellant's answers to the officer's interrogation, and by commenting, "I think the jury is entitled to know this." These references to appellant's silence constituted prejudicial error. See Commonwealth v. Haideman, 449 Pa. 367, 296 A.2d 765 (1972). The prejudice to appellant was heightened by the fact that the improper references occurred because of questions and comments from the bench, and this prejudice was not cured by the trial judge's curative instruction at the end of the trial.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Summaries of

Commonwealth v. Seel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Jun 29, 1979
406 A.2d 1148 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979)
Case details for

Commonwealth v. Seel

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. James Ronald SEEL, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 29, 1979

Citations

406 A.2d 1148 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1979)
406 A.2d 1148

Citing Cases

Com. v. Williams

While it is apparent that the trial judge did attempt to cure his indiscretion, the prejudicial effect of the…

Commonwealth v. Rhem

On the contrary, appellant was vehemently protesting his innocence but was frustrated in his endeavors. This…