From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Peter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 13, 2009
971 A.2d 492 (Pa. 2009)

Summary

In Com. v. Peter, Judge, 136 Ky. 689, 124 S.W. 896, 898, the Commonwealth sought a mandamus against the respondent, a judge of the Jefferson County Court, to compel him to require the Fidelity Trust Company, as executor, to file inventories of certain decedents' estates, and to make settlements of its accounts of those estates where the executor had failed to make such settlements for more than two years.

Summary of this case from Smith v. Shamburger

Opinion

No. 35 EAL 2009.

May 13, 2009.

Appeal from the Superior Court Pa.Super., 965 A.2d 300.


Dispositions of Petitions for Allowance of Appeals Denied.


Summaries of

Com. v. Peter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 13, 2009
971 A.2d 492 (Pa. 2009)

In Com. v. Peter, Judge, 136 Ky. 689, 124 S.W. 896, 898, the Commonwealth sought a mandamus against the respondent, a judge of the Jefferson County Court, to compel him to require the Fidelity Trust Company, as executor, to file inventories of certain decedents' estates, and to make settlements of its accounts of those estates where the executor had failed to make such settlements for more than two years.

Summary of this case from Smith v. Shamburger
Case details for

Com. v. Peter

Case Details

Full title:Com. v. Peter

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 13, 2009

Citations

971 A.2d 492 (Pa. 2009)
601 Pa. 688

Citing Cases

Smith v. Shamburger

We must, therefore, decide whether the County Court is exceeding its jurisdiction, or, if not, whether it is…