From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. McClain

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 28, 1978
478 Pa. 10 (Pa. 1978)

Opinion

Argued April 18, 1977.

Decided April 28, 1978.

Appeal No. 98 January Term, 1976, from the Judgment of Sentence of the Court of Common Pleas, Trial Division Criminal Section of Philadelphia County, Imposed on No. 168, May Session, 1974; James T. McDermott, Judge.

Herman, Bayer Silberstein, Frederick R. Herman, Philadelphia, for appellant.

F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Dist. Atty., Steven H. Goldblatt, Chief, Appeals Div., Denis Cohen, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

Before EAGEN, C. J., and O'BRIEN, ROBERTS, POMEROY, NIX and MANDERINO, JJ.


OPINION


Appellant was convicted of murder of the second degree, aggravated assault, possession of a controlled substance and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. The conviction of murder of the second degree was directly appealed to this Court.

Our jurisdiction in this case is based on Section 202(1) of the Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act of 1970, 17 Pa.C.S.A. § 211.202 (1) (Supp. 1977-78).

The single issue raised in this appeal is that appellant was denied a fair trial because the prosecuting attorney used his peremptory challenges to exclude Blacks from the jury. We need not reach the merits of this argument since appellant has waived this issue. See Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1123.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.


Summaries of

Com. v. McClain

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 28, 1978
478 Pa. 10 (Pa. 1978)
Case details for

Com. v. McClain

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. James McCLAIN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 28, 1978

Citations

478 Pa. 10 (Pa. 1978)
385 A.2d 970

Citing Cases

Com. v. Hitson

When, however, the trial court follows the requirements of Blair and refuses to consider issues raised in the…

Com. v. Kozek

The trial court acted correctly in insisting upon compliance with Rule 1123(a) and Blair, and properly found…