From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. Grant

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District
Apr 28, 2003
821 A.2d 1246 (Pa. 2003)

Opinion

April 28, 2003.

No. 57 WAP 2001, Application for Reargument.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 28th day of April, 2003, the Application for Reargument is DENIED.

We clarify that the rule announced in Commonwealth v. Grant, 813 A.2d 726 (Pa. 2002), does not apply to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel where the intermediate appellate court on direct appeal has rendered a disposition on the merits.


Summaries of

Com. v. Grant

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District
Apr 28, 2003
821 A.2d 1246 (Pa. 2003)
Case details for

Com. v. Grant

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee v. TAIBU MODAMU GRANT A/K/A BRYANT…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District

Date published: Apr 28, 2003

Citations

821 A.2d 1246 (Pa. 2003)
821 A.2d 1246

Citing Cases

Rush v. Beard

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court clarified that the rule announced in Grant does not apply to claims of…