From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. v. DeFusco

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 5, 1990
523 Pa. 425 (Pa. 1990)

Opinion

Argued December 15, 1989.

Decided January 5, 1990.

Appeal No. 57 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1989 from Order of Superior Court 378 Pa. Super. 442, 549 A.2d 140 (1988) entered August 25, 1988, at No. 113 Philadelphia 1988, Vacating Order of Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, Trial Division, Criminal Section, entered February 2, 1987, at Misc. No. 86-920250.

Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Deputy Dist. Atty., Ronald Eisenberg, Chief, Appeals Div., Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., William G. Chadwick, First Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellant.

John M Elliott, Brian P. Kenney, Philadelphia, for amicus-Delaware River Port Authority.

Alan L. Yatvin, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.


ORDER


Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Com. v. DeFusco

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 5, 1990
523 Pa. 425 (Pa. 1990)
Case details for

Com. v. DeFusco

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant, v. Louis DeFUSCO

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 5, 1990

Citations

523 Pa. 425 (Pa. 1990)
567 A.2d 1043

Citing Cases

Terminato v. Pennsylvania Nat. Ins. Co.

It is well established that a regulation cannot be upheld if it is contrary to the statute under which it is…

McComb v. Wambaugh

No regulation can override legislative intent and extend beyond the legislative scheme. Commonwealth v.…