From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Com. of Pa. v. Roberson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb 21, 2018
181 A.3d 1128 (Pa. 2018)

Summary

In EQT Prod. Co. v. Pa. Dep't of Environ. Prot., 181 A.3d 1128 (Pa. 2018), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania interpreted Section 301 of the CSL, which applies to pollution from industrial waste.

Summary of this case from Tressler v. Summit Twp.

Opinion

No. 650 MAL 2017

02-21-2018

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Alexandria M.H. ROBERSON, Petitioner


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

Com. of Pa. v. Roberson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Feb 21, 2018
181 A.3d 1128 (Pa. 2018)

In EQT Prod. Co. v. Pa. Dep't of Environ. Prot., 181 A.3d 1128 (Pa. 2018), the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania interpreted Section 301 of the CSL, which applies to pollution from industrial waste.

Summary of this case from Tressler v. Summit Twp.
Case details for

Com. of Pa. v. Roberson

Case Details

Full title:COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Respondent v. Alexandria M.H. ROBERSON…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Date published: Feb 21, 2018

Citations

181 A.3d 1128 (Pa. 2018)

Citing Cases

EQT Prod. Co. v. Dep't of Envtl. Prot.

On appeal, EQT raises four questions with respect to the assessed penalty. First, EQT asks whether…

Tressler v. Summit Twp.

Finally, this broad interpretation of Section 201 is consistent with an instructive recent decision by the…