From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 16, 2022
335 So. 3d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2028

03-16-2022

David Craig COLVILLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

David Craig Colville, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


David Craig Colville, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleadings pending below, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (dismissing a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

Ray, Winokur, and Jay, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Colville v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 16, 2022
335 So. 3d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Colville v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Craig COLVILLE, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

335 So. 3d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)