From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Columbus v. Williams

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 10, 1973
36 Ohio St. 2d 7 (Ohio 1973)

Summary

In Columbus v. Williams (1973), 36 Ohio St.2d 7, we reversed a conviction for the alleged violation of R.C. 2905.301, which prohibits the utterance of "obscene or licentious language in the presence or hearing of a female * * *."

Summary of this case from Columbus v. Fraley

Opinion

No. 73-149

Decided October 10, 1973.

Criminal law — Prohibition against obscene language — R.C. 2905.301 — Conviction reversed, when.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

Defendant was arrested and charged with violating R.C. 2905.301 which prohibits the utterance of "obscene or licentious language in the presence or hearing of a female * * *."

It is admitted by defendant that she "did speak the word of which she was accused in the affidavit, and that she did so in the presence of" a female.

Defendant was convicted in the Franklin County Municipal Court, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

The cause is before this court pursuant to an appeal as of right and the allowance of defendant's motion to certify the record.

Mr. James J. Hughes, Jr., city attorney, Mr. Daniel W. Johnson and Mr. Walter Boyuk, for appellee.

Mr. R. Raymond Twohig, Jr., and Ms. Mary Ellen Wynn, for appellant.


The judgment of the Court of Appeals must be reversed on authority of Cohen v. California (1971), 403 U.S. 15, and the defendant is ordered discharged.

Judgment reversed.

O'NEILL, C.J., HERBERT, CORRIGAN, STERN, CELEBREZZE, W. BROWN and P. BROWN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Columbus v. Williams

Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 10, 1973
36 Ohio St. 2d 7 (Ohio 1973)

In Columbus v. Williams (1973), 36 Ohio St.2d 7, we reversed a conviction for the alleged violation of R.C. 2905.301, which prohibits the utterance of "obscene or licentious language in the presence or hearing of a female * * *."

Summary of this case from Columbus v. Fraley
Case details for

Columbus v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF COLUMBUS, APPELLEE, v. WILLIAMS, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Oct 10, 1973

Citations

36 Ohio St. 2d 7 (Ohio 1973)
302 N.E.2d 582

Citing Cases

State v. Schwing

This has been the position of this court in prior cases involving the same vulgar epithets for which…

Frolik v. State

Gooding, 405 U.S. at 520, 92 S.Ct. at 1105. See Rosen v. California, 416 U.S. 924, 94 S.Ct. 1922, 40 L.Ed.2d…