Opinion
Nos. 1978, 570525/06.
November 13, 2007.
Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department, entered December 21, 2006, which reversed an order, Civil Court, New York County (Michelle D. Schreiber, J.), dated December 21, 2005, granting tenant's motion to dismiss the petition in a nonprimary residence summary holdover proceeding, and reinstated the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Penn Proefriedt Schwarzfeld Schwartz, New York (Sharyn A.Tritto of counsel), for appellant.
Thomas S. Fleishell Associates, P.C., New York (Susan C.Stanley of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Appellate Term correctly determined that the notice of nonrenewal was timely served. While a landlord serving a 10-day notice to cure by mail must factor an additional five days into the cure period ( Matter of ATM One v Landaverde, 2 NY3d 472 [2004]), there is no requirement that a landlord add five days to service by mail of a 90/150-day notice of nonrenewal ( 21 W. 58th St. Corp. v Foster, 44 AD3d 410; Skyview Holdings, LLC v Cunningham, 13 Misc 3d 102).