From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Columbia Banking, Saving Loan v. Phoenix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1963
18 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

January 17, 1963

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: Our affirmance is without prejudice to the rights of the defendants, who are to be added by supplemental summonses and amended complaints, to object to being made parties to these actions. Indeed, we do not reach the procedural questions as to whether they can lawfully be added. Inasmuch as they are not parties to the present motion our determination is not binding on them. It simply appears to us, upon a prima facie examination of the papers, that they "ought to be [parties] if complete relief is to be accorded to those already parties" (Civ. Prac. Act, § 193, subd. 1). The order is also without prejudice to a motion by defendants to consolidate with the present actions an action which may now be pending in Supreme Court, Ontario County, instituted by Harold J. Van Opdorp, as trustee in bankruptcy of Lamplighter, Inc., against the defendants-respondents.


Summaries of

Columbia Banking, Saving Loan v. Phoenix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 17, 1963
18 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Columbia Banking, Saving Loan v. Phoenix

Case Details

Full title:COLUMBIA BANKING, SAVING LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. PHOENIX INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
236 N.Y.S.2d 895