Opinion
Civil Action No. 06-20J.
March 31, 2006
MEMORANDUM ORDER
The above-captioned habeas petition was received by the Clerk of Court on February 3, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. In addition, on February 14, 2006, Petitioner, a former attorney who resigned from the Ohio bar with discipline pending, filed a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, (Doc. No. 9), a Motion for Scheduling of Rule 65 Request for TRO Hearing, (Doc. No. 7) and a Motion for Immediate Release on Bail, (Doc. No. 6).
The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11), filed on March 1, 2006, recommended that the three above motions be denied. Service was made on the Petitioner at FCI Loretto, PO Box 1000, Loretto, PA 15940-1000, which was the address listed on the docket. Petitioner was informed that in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrates, he had ten (10) days to file any objections. No objections were filed. After review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2006;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, (Doc. No. 9), the Motion for Scheduling of Rule 65 Request for TRO Hearing, (Doc. No. 7) and the Motion for Immediate Release on Bail, (Doc. No. 6) are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 11), filed on March 1, 2006, by Magistrate Judge Lenihan, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.