From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colston v. Redick

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 16, 2007
Case No. 1-02-CV-779 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 16, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 1-02-CV-779.

February 16, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Mark Colston's (fourth) Motion for Relief from Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(2) and (3).

Motions pursuant to Rule 60(b)(2) and (3) must be made "not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken." FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b). Plaintiff brings his Motion more than one year after the March 30, 2005 Judgment. Therefore, Plaintiff's Motion under Rule 60(b)(2) and (3) must be denied. Further, even if the Motion is construed under Rule 60(b)(6), which is not subject to a one year limitation, Plaintiff fails to show "exceptional circumstances" warranting relief. See Jinks v. AlliedSignal, Inc., 250 F.3d 381, 387 (6th Cir. 2001); Blue Diamond Coal. Co. v. Trustees of UMWA Combined Ben. Fund, 249 F.3d 519, 524 (6th Cir. 2001); Olle v. Henry Wright Corp., 910 F.2d 357, 365 (6th Cir. 1990).

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Mark Colston's Motion for Relief from Judgment (Dkt. No. 153) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Colston v. Redick

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 16, 2007
Case No. 1-02-CV-779 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Colston v. Redick

Case Details

Full title:MARK COLSTON, Plaintiff, v. DIANE REDICK, sued in her individual and…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 16, 2007

Citations

Case No. 1-02-CV-779 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 16, 2007)