Opinion
Appellate case number: 01-14-01020-CR
12-17-2015
ORDER Trial court case number: 991804 Trial court: 185th District Court of Harris County
The "Motion for Substitution of Counsel on Appeal" filed by Diogu Kalu Diogu does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5. Pursuant to Rule 6.5, an attorney seeking to withdraw from representing a party in the appellate court must file a motion seeking withdraw. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. A motion for leave to withdraw must contain (1) a list of current deadlines and settings in the case; (2) the party's name and last known address and telephone number; (3) a statement that a copy of the motion was delivered to the party; and (4) a statement that the party was notified in writing of the right to object to the motion. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a). If an attorney substitutes for the withdrawing attorney, the motion may instead contain only the substitute attorney's name, mailing address, telephone number, fax number, if any, and State Bar of Texas identification number. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(d). In either instance, the motion must be delivered to the party in person or mailed to the party at the party's last known address by both certified and first-class mail. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b).
The notice of appearance filed by Diogu Kalu Diogu fails to comply with Rule 6.5 because it was not filed by nor did it contain the signature of purportedly withdrawing counsel, namely, Winston Cochran, and it does not indicate that it has been delivered to the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to STRIKE the notice. Any future filings seeking withdrawal and substitution of counsel must comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5.
It is so ORDERED. Judge's signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle
[×] Acting individually [ ] Acting for the Court Date: December 17, 2015