From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colson v. Scroggins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 17, 1992
606 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 91-03890.

October 14, 1992. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, J. Lewis Hall, J.

Craig F. Hall of Hall Hall, P.A., Gainesville, for appellant.

Stephen Marc Slepin of Slepin Slepin, Tallahassee, for appellee Carol Scroggins.


This cause is before us on appeal from a final judgment equitably distributing among the various claimants a bond held by the Department of Labor and Employment Security (DLES) as security for workers' compensation benefits. Appellant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in conducting a final hearing without proper notice as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440(c).

On October 3, 1991, Scroggins filed with the court and opposing counsel a notice scheduling final hearing for October 8, 1991. The notice was not received by Colson's counsel, who did not attend the final hearing. There was no order by the court setting the cause for trial pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440(c).

The only issue remaining was whether there should be a reduction of Scroggins' interest in the security bond and corresponding increase in the other claimants' interest, by virtue of Scroggins' having recourse against Florida Self-Insurers Guaranty Association, Inc.

Upon learning that final hearing had been conducted, Colson filed a motion for rehearing with supporting affidavit. The court denied the motion for rehearing and entered final judgment on October 29, 1991.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440(c) states in pertinent part:

If the court finds the action ready to be set for trial, it shall enter an order fixing a date for trial. The trial shall be set not less than 30 days from the service of the notice for trial.

This rule has been held mandatory and applicable to final hearings as well as to trial. See, e.g., Rivera v. Rivera, 562 So.2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

We have previously "disapproved the local procedure of parties scheduling nonjury matters simply by having the trial date and time reserved on the judge's calendar, followed by notice furnished by counsel to the opposing parties or their counsel." Bennett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc., 492 So.2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), citing, Padgett v. First Federal Savings Loan Association of Santa Rosa County, 378 So.2d 58 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Rivera, supra.

Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

BOOTH, SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Colson v. Scroggins

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 17, 1992
606 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Colson v. Scroggins

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL GLEN COLSON, APPELLANT, v. CAROL SCROGGINS; CHARLIE MACON, IN HIS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 17, 1992

Citations

606 So. 2d 472 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Vaos v. Vaos

The notice was not sent by the court, nor did it allow at least thirty days from service for the final…

Simpson v. Simpson

This rule has been held mandatory and applicable to final hearings as well as to jury trials. See Colson v.…