From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colson v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2674 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2674 MCE EFB P

09-12-2011

ARTHUR MILTON COLSON, Petitioner, v. R. BARNES, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's September 6, 2011 motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Colson v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2674 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Colson v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR MILTON COLSON, Petitioner, v. R. BARNES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2674 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)