From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 5, 1984
318 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

68032.

DECIDED APRIL 5, 1984.

Drug violation. Liberty Superior Court. Before Judge Harvey.

Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, Claude M. Kicklighter, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


Defendant appeals his conviction of two counts alleging the sale of marijuana. His appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 ( 87 SC 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief stating that the only real issue in the case was identity. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 ( 229 S.E.2d 406), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We are in agreement with counsel that the point raised is not meritorious and an independent examination discloses no errors of any substance. Therefore, this court has granted the motion to withdraw and we affirm the conviction. The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant's guilt of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 ( 264 S.E.2d 528).

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong and Carley, JJ., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 5, 1984.


Summaries of

Colon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 5, 1984
318 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Colon v. State

Case Details

Full title:COLON v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 5, 1984

Citations

318 S.E.2d 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
318 S.E.2d 68