From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colon v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 15, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-225-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07-cv-225-KRG-KAP.

December 15, 2008


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 17, 2008, docket no. 22, recommending that the motion to dismiss the complaint by the remaining defendant Irwin, docket no. 17, be granted. The parties were notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to serve and file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff filed a bizarre pleading styled as objections, docket no. 23, but no coherent objections have been filed and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter and the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 15th day of December, 2008, it is

ORDERED that defendant Irwin's motion to dismiss the complaint, docket no. 17, is granted. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

Colon v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 15, 2008
Case No. 3:07-cv-225-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2008)
Case details for

Colon v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND COLON, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT GERALD ROZUM, S.C.I. SOMERSET…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 15, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:07-cv-225-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Dec. 15, 2008)