From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colon v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2011
1:11-cv-01420-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

1:11-cv-01420-SMS (HC) DOCUMENT #1

08-30-2011

BERNARDO COLON, Petitioner, v. BRENDA M. CASH, Respondent.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See, e.g., Anderson v. Heinze, 258 F.2d 479, 481 (9th Cir. 1958); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir. 1984). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case if "the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. In the present case, the Court does not find that the interests of justice require the appointment of counsel at the present time. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's request for appointment of counsel is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sandra M. Snyder

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Colon v. Cash

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 30, 2011
1:11-cv-01420-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Colon v. Cash

Case Details

Full title:BERNARDO COLON, Petitioner, v. BRENDA M. CASH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

1:11-cv-01420-SMS (HC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2011)