From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colo. Cross-Disability Coal. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2013
Civil Action No: 09-cv-02757-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No: 09-cv-02757-WYD-KMT

01-24-2013

COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ABERCROMBIE & FITCH CO., et al., Defendants.

Amy F. Robertson Kevin W. Williams Andrew C. Montoya Timothy P. Fox Mark A. Knueve Gregory A. Eurich


SENIOR JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

Courtroom Deputy: Ellen E. Miller
E.C.R./Reporter: Tammy Hoffschildt

Counsel:

Amy F. Robertson

Kevin W. Williams

Andrew C. Montoya

Timothy P. Fox

Mark A. Knueve

Gregory A. Eurich

COURTROOM MINUTES

MOTION HEARING

10:07 a.m. Court in Session

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL.

Court's opening remarks.

Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Entry of Injunction and Entry of

Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 162), filed April 27, 2012, and Defendants' Motion for

Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, to Vacate August 31, 2011 Order (ECF

Doc. No. 164), filed May 3, 2012, are raised for argument.
10:29 a.m. Argument by Defendants (Mr. Knueve). 10:46 a.m. Argument by Plaintiffs (Ms. Robertson). 11:01 a.m. Comments and questions by the Court. ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Entry of Injunction and Entry of Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 162), filed April 27, 2012, is GRANTED, for reasons as set forth on the record. Although the motion is granted, the Court is not imposing an actual injunction at this time. An injunction, in its written form, will issue at a future date. ORDERED: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, to Vacate August 31, 2011 Order (ECF Doc. No. 164), filed May 3, 2012, is DENIED in its entirety, for reasons as set forth on the record. The Court reaffirms its August 31, 2011 Order (ECF Doc. No. 109). ORDERED: As set forth on the record, Plaintiffs shall file a proposed order addressing both ECF Doc. Nos. 162 and 164 with the Court not later than Friday, February 8, 2013. ORDERED: Within forty-five (45) days of today's date, the parties shall meet and confer to determine if they can resolve this case with a settlement or reach an agreement on the remedy/remedies subject to the Defendants maintaining whatever legal rights they choose to maintain. Then, Plaintiffs shall file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (proposed order) as to the Injunction. Should the parties be unable to reach agreement as to an acceptable remedy/remedies, the parties are directed to request a hearing. 11:29: a.m. Court in Recess - HEARING CONCLUDED. TOTAL TIME: 01:22


Summaries of

Colo. Cross-Disability Coal. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2013
Civil Action No: 09-cv-02757-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Colo. Cross-Disability Coal. v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.

Case Details

Full title:COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ABERCROMBIE …

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No: 09-cv-02757-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2013)