Opinion
No. 04-75734.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Decided March 16, 2007.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A77-384-724.
Before: KOZINSKI, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Guadalupe Violeta Colmenares-Venegas seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge's order denying her application for cancellation of removal. We deny the petition for review.
Colmenares-Venegas's due process claims related to the adequacy of the record are unavailing because she has failed to demonstrate how additional hearing transcripts would have affected the outcome of the proceedings. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).
Colmenares-Venegas's contentions regarding the propriety of the Notice to Appear are also unavailing. See Kohli v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1061, 1067-70 (9th Cir. 2007).