From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collision Depot, Inc. v. Zigman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2002
294 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

00-09046

Argued April 9, 2002

May 20, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1104-a to dissolve three closely-held corporations, where the respondents have elected to purchase the shares owned by the petitioner's decedent pursuant to Business Corporation Law § 1118, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered December 22, 2000, which, upon an order of the same court, entered August 3, 2000, determined the aggregate fair value of the petitioner's decedent's shares in the three corporations as of September 7, 1999, to be $48,040.

Kenneth B. Schwartz, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Michael H. Soroka, Garden City, N.Y., for respondent Robert Zigman, a/k/a EPA Auto Body, and Ackerman, Levine, Cullen Brickman, LLP, Great Neck, N.Y. (James A. Bradley of counsel), for respondents Allen Lipp, Collision Depot, Inc., Kenal Motors, Inc., d/b/a Collision Depot, and 600 Atlantic Avenue Corp. (one brief filed).

FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, and THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The determination of a fact-finder as to the value of a business, if it is within the range of testimony presented, will not be disturbed on appeal where the valuation rests primarily on the credibility of the expert witnesses and their valuation techniques (see Matter of Davis v. Alpha Packaging Indus., 267 A.D.2d 384; Dempster v. Dempster, 236 A.D.2d 582). The Supreme Court's determination of the fair value of the shares of stock of the petitioner's decedent in the three closely-held corporations is supported by the record. The petitioner's contrary interpretation of the facts and credibility of the witnesses does not warrant disturbing the Supreme Court's determination (see Matter of Davis v. Alpha Packaging Indus., supra; Matter of Funplex, Inc., 252 A.D.2d 923).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

SANTUCCI, J.P., ALTMAN, McGINITY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Collision Depot, Inc. v. Zigman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2002
294 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Collision Depot, Inc. v. Zigman

Case Details

Full title:COLLISION DEPOT, 600 ATLANTIC AVENUE CORP. ROBIN LESSMAN, etc., appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 2002

Citations

294 A.D.2d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
742 N.Y.S.2d 856

Citing Cases

In re USA Nutritionals, Inc.

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the petitioner. The determination of a fact-finder as to the…

DeAngelis v. AVC Services, Inc.

The determination of a factfinder as to the value of a business, if it is within the range of the testimony…