From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
118 N.C. 265 (N.C. 1896)

Opinion

(February Term, 1896.)

PRACTICE — REFERENCE — WAIVER OF JURY — FINDINGS OF REFEREE — APPEAL — ASSIGNMENT OF ERRORS.

1. Where an order of reference is made at plaintiff's request, or without objection by him, the right to a trial by jury is thereby waived and cannot be recalled, except by consent of all parties.

2. The findings of fact by a referee, when there is any evidence to support them, is conclusive.

3. Where no error is assigned on appeal the judgment below will be affirmed.

ACTION heard before Timberlake, J., at Fall Term, 1895, of HARNETT.

(266) L. B. Chapin and W. E. Murchison for plaintiff.

F. B. Jones for defendant.


There was judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appealed.


At the trial, but before the case was heard, the plaintiff demanded a jury trial, which was refused. In the case sent to this Court by his Honor it appears that when the order of reference was made the plaintiff interposed no objection, and also that the order was made at the plaintiff's request. This was a waiver of the right to a jury trial which could not be recalled except by consent. Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N.C. 515, where the authorities are collected.

The findings of fact by the referee, when there is any evidence, are not reviewable in this Court. The exceptions made before the referee in this case are not reviewable here. The case states that the plaintiff excepted to the judgment, but no errors are assigned, so that in this respect there is nothing before us.

Affirmed.

Cited: Dunavant v. R. R., 122 N.C. 1001; Belvin v. Paper Co., 123 N.C. 150; Kerr v. Hicks, 129 N.C. 144; Foy v. Gray, 148 N.C. 437; Lumber Co. v. Lumber Co., 169 N.C. 91.


Summaries of

Collins v. Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 1, 1896
118 N.C. 265 (N.C. 1896)
Case details for

Collins v. Young

Case Details

Full title:HARDY COLLINS v. YOUNG BROTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Feb 1, 1896

Citations

118 N.C. 265 (N.C. 1896)
23 S.E. 1005

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Wilson

It is a father's duty to support his minor children and that duty is not affected by divorce and the…

Vetter v. Vetter

"In the enforcement of this parental obligation, we have consistently adhered to the principle that after a…