From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 15, 1967
381 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1967)

Opinion

No. 21605.

August 10, 1967. Rehearing Denied September 15, 1967.

James William Collins, in pro per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Before BARNES, HAMLEY and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.


The appeal in this case is frivolous. Collins sues the Warden of San Quentin Prison, where he is an inmate, and the prison accountant, under the Civil Rights Act. He claims $50,000 damages because his opposition to an extension of time to file a brief, requested by the California Attorney General in Collins' pending appeal to this court in habeas corpus, was delayed in mailing for five days. This court granted the extension on March 25, 1966, the day on which Collins' opposition would have been mailed had there been no delay. Moreover, when the extension was granted, we had before us Collins' motion to hold the appellee in the habeas corpus case in default because his brief had not been filed in time, and we denied that motion on April 4, 1966. In short, Collins' contentions were brought to the attention of this court and were ruled upon. The delay in mailing caused Collins no legally cognizable damages.

Collins v. Wilson, 9 Cir., 1966, 368 F.2d 995.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Collins v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 15, 1967
381 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1967)
Case details for

Collins v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:James William COLLINS, Appellant, v. Lawrence E. WILSON, Warden et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 15, 1967

Citations

381 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1967)

Citing Cases

Pickett v. Schaefer

It is well established that a single delay or interference with a prisoner's mail service does not constitute…