From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. U.S. District Court

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2243 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2243 LKK KJM P.

October 20, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


On June 2, 2005, an order issued by the court was served upon plaintiff's address of record. The order was returned to the court by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable on June 9, 2005. Under Local Rule 83-183, plaintiff must keep the court apprised of his current address. Because mail directed to plaintiff was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable, and plaintiff failed to notify the court within sixty days thereafter of his current address, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute.See id.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Collins v. U.S. District Court

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2243 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)
Case details for

Collins v. U.S. District Court

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR M. COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2243 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2005)