Collins v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Mullis v. State

    627 So. 2d 1078 (Ala. Crim. App. 1993)   Cited 1 times

    This issue, however, is not preserved for review because the appellant failed to object to the trial court's comment. Story v. State, 588 So.2d 948 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991) (only matters timely raised before the trial court from to which the appellant receives an adverse ruling are preserved for review); Collins v. State, 586 So.2d 992 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991) (matter raised for the first time on appeal is raised too late for review). IV

  2. Hale v. State

    611 So. 2d 1202 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992)   Cited 4 times

    Therefore, this issue concerning the introduction of Young's guilty plea has not been preserved for appellate review on direct appeal. An objection to a question believed to violate the rules of evidence must be made before an answer is given. Collins v. State, 586 So.2d 992 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991); Willingham v. State, 261 Ala. 454, 74 So.2d 241 (1954). An objection to a question made after an answer is given is not timely and will not preserve the issue for review unless an oral motion to exclude the answer is promptly made. Woods v. State, 437 So.2d 636 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983); Flowers v. State, 402 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 402 So.2d 1094 (Ala. 1981).