From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. People

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 16, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01205-PMP-(PAL) (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-01205-PMP-(PAL).

August 16, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has filed a document titled "Rule 60 Demur" (#4), which the court construes as a motion for relief from the judgment pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The filing fee of $350 is a matter of law. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Because plaintiff is a prisoner, he must pay that fee, either in full at the commencement of this action or through monthly installments if the court grants him leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The court dismissed this action because plaintiff, a prisoner, neither paid the filing fee nor submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a statement of his inmate account and a financial certificate signed by the appropriate prison official. Nothing in plaintiff's motion (#4) would cause the court to reinstate the action. The dismissal was without prejudice, so plaintiff may commence a new action if he pays the fee or if he files the correct documents.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's "Rule 60 Demur" (#4), which the court construes as a motion for relief from the judgment pursuant to Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Collins v. People

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Aug 16, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01205-PMP-(PAL) (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Collins v. People

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-01205-PMP-(PAL) (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)