From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. North Side Publishing Co.

City Court of New York — General Term
Nov 1, 1892
1 Misc. 211 (N.Y. Misc. 1892)

Opinion

November, 1892.

William G. McCrea, for defendant (appellant).

Douglas Minton, for plaintiff (respondent).


This is an action for the price of printing inks amounting to $178.66, all unpaid except $31.25, which was paid by advertising done for plaintiff.

The plaintiff demands judgment for balance, $147.41. The answer admits incorporation of defendant, and then further answering, "alleges that it has no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of all the other allegations contained in said complaint."

Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings, which was granted on the ground that the answer was frivolous. From the order entered thereon, this appeal is taken. The Code, section 500, requires an answer to contain "a general or specific denial of each material allegation of the complaint controverted by the defendant, or of any knowledge or information thereof sufficient to form a belief." The answer of the defendant herein, clearly does not controvert each material allegation of the complaint as required by the Code. It only alleges that the defendant has no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of all such allegations under such a form of pleading; the defendant might have knowledge of all the allegations of a complaint except one, and yet his answer would be literally correct. Such a conjunctive denial is bad, and not authorized by the Code. If a defendant has knowledge or information of the material allegations of the complaint, the Code requires him to deny each allegation controverted by him, and the fact that he claims to have no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief, does not relieve him from saying so concerning each and every allegation which he so wishes to controvert. I think that the proper form of a denial such as the defendant adopted, should read: "The defendant alleges that he has no knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as to the truth of each allegation contained in the complaint."

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

EHRLICH, Ch. J., and NEWBURGER, J., concur.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Collins v. North Side Publishing Co.

City Court of New York — General Term
Nov 1, 1892
1 Misc. 211 (N.Y. Misc. 1892)
Case details for

Collins v. North Side Publishing Co.

Case Details

Full title:COLLINS v . NORTH SIDE PUBLISHING CO

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1892

Citations

1 Misc. 211 (N.Y. Misc. 1892)
20 N.Y.S. 892

Citing Cases

Scully v. Wolf

Under no possible theory could the use of those words be construed as destroying the effectiveness of the…

Curran v. Arp

Such a denial is a conjunctive one, and its vice is similar in character to the vice known as a negative…