From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Lama

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1947
273 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)

Opinion

December 22, 1947.


Order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in action to foreclose a mortgage, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. If, as asserted by defendant Alfred A. Lama, the consideration for the note given to plaintiff was a secret agreement in violation of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933 (U.S. Code, tit. 12, § 1461 et seq), and so void as against public policy, that was a matter of defense to be raised in the action upon that note in the Municipal Court. A payment made pursuant to a stipulated judgment therein entered cannot constitute a payment on account of the mortgage here sought to be foreclosed. Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Collins v. Lama

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 22, 1947
273 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)
Case details for

Collins v. Lama

Case Details

Full title:MAE COLLINS, Appellant, v. ALFRED A. LAMA, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1947

Citations

273 App. Div. 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1947)