From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Collins v. Isaacs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1939
258 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Summary

In Collins v. Isaacs, N.Y., 1939, 258 App. Div. 806, 15 N.Y.S. 2d 983, the court stated: "This cause of action was not provable under the bankruptcy act, U.S. Code, Title 11 Section 103 sub a. cl. (7), 11 U.S.C.A. Section 103, sub a., cl. 7, because Plaintiff's action was not instituted prior to and was not pending at the time of the filing of defendant's petition in bankruptcy.

Summary of this case from Opinion No. 68-185

Opinion

November 20, 1939.

Appeal from City Court of White Plains.


Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The cause of action was not provable under the Bankruptcy Act (U.S. Code, tit. 11, § 103, subd. a, cl. [7]), because plaintiff's action was not instituted prior to and was not pending at the time of the filing of defendant's petition in bankruptcy. The judgment in favor of plaintiff's husband for expenses and loss of services caused by the injuries for which plaintiff sues, which was recovered prior to defendant's bankruptcy, was not an adjudication of plaintiff's claim against the defendant, or even evidence of defendant's liability to plaintiff. ( Haverhill v. International R. Co., 217 App. Div. 521, 524; affd., 244 N.Y. 582; Berg v. Third Ave. R.R., [not officially published] 89 N.Y. Supp. 433; Furlong v. Banta, 80 Hun, 248; Syczyk v. Szczerbaniewicz, 233 App. Div. 342.) Plaintiff's claim was, therefore, not provable under clause (7) or clause (1) of the above section and subdivision of the Bankruptcy Act, and was not barred. While it was alleged in the complaint that the judgment in favor of plaintiff's husband adjudicated defendant's liability to plaintiff, that was merely an erroneous conclusion of law, which was not admitted for the purposes of the motion to dismiss. ( Greeff v. Equitable Life Assur. Society, 160 N.Y. 19, 29; Irving v. Rees, 146 App. Div. 703, 707.) Lazansky, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Collins v. Isaacs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1939
258 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

In Collins v. Isaacs, N.Y., 1939, 258 App. Div. 806, 15 N.Y.S. 2d 983, the court stated: "This cause of action was not provable under the bankruptcy act, U.S. Code, Title 11 Section 103 sub a. cl. (7), 11 U.S.C.A. Section 103, sub a., cl. 7, because Plaintiff's action was not instituted prior to and was not pending at the time of the filing of defendant's petition in bankruptcy.

Summary of this case from Opinion No. 68-185
Case details for

Collins v. Isaacs

Case Details

Full title:CARRIE COLLINS, Appellant, v. JEANNETTE ISAACS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1939

Citations

258 App. Div. 806 (N.Y. App. Div. 1939)

Citing Cases

Opinion No. 68-185

See also In Re Cohen, 1938, D.C., E. Dist. NY, 25 F. Supp. 365. Subsequent to the 1934 Act, supra, the…